A result equal to the limit is a pass
The standard says the value shall not exceed the maximum, so a result exactly at the limit is a pass. Two rows of the specimen sit exactly on a bound and both are marked pass: high boiling residue at 0.01 against a maximum of 0.01, and R-125 at 51.5% against a window that ends at 51.5%.
The decision rule behind that is simple acceptance: the measured value is compared with the limit as printed, and measurement uncertainty is not subtracted from the result or added to the limit before the comparison. AHRI 700-2024 §4.4.2 states that uncertainty is already accounted for in the tables. We publish the rule because a boundary result with an unstated rule is the one you end up explaining on the phone.
A blend can be high purity and still fail
Each component has its own two-sided window plus a 0.5%-by-weight cap on anything that is not a named component. A blend can be 99.5% pure and still fail. The specimen is the case in the flesh: only 0.4% by weight of it is anything other than a named component, so by the arithmetic that produces a “purity” figure it is 99.6% pure. It still fails, because the two named components are in the wrong ratio to each other, and no purity number can see that.
The same illustrative lot judged two ways| Judged on purityNot a characteristic in AHRI 700 | 99.6% vs 99.5% min | Pass |
|---|
| Judged on compositionWhat the standard actually specifies | R-32 48.1 (48.5–50.5) · R-125 51.5 (49.5–51.5) | Fail |
|---|
Read the two rows in the order a batch moves: a purity line would have released this lot. That is the failure mode, and it runs in both directions — the full set of composition windows is published so you can check ours against your own material before you send anything.
Non-condensables read Not Applicable, never Pass
Refrigerants whose normal boiling point is at or above room temperature are exempt. We report those as Not Applicable, never as a pass and never as blank. Printing a pass against a limit for a determination the standard does not ask for reports a test that was not run; printing a blank invites someone to assume it was missed. The value is stored as absent, not as zero, and it renders as its own third state.
Under the federally incorporated appendix the exempt fluids are R-11, R-113, R-123, R-141b, R-245fa, R-1233zd(E). The list is not the same in every edition — that is one of several reasons the report names the edition it was judged against rather than citing “AHRI 700” and leaving it there.
Illustrative extract · same report format · R-123 recovered from a low-pressure chiller
Illustrative extract of the analysis table for R-123, showing the non-condensables exemption and the water limit that applies to this refrigerant| Characteristic | Measured | Limit for R-123 | Verdict |
|---|
| Air and other non-condensables% by volume @ 25.0 °C | Not determined | Determination not required | Not applicable |
|---|
| Waterppm by weight | 15.0 | 20 max | Pass |
|---|
| All other volatile impurities% by weight | 0.28 | 0.5 max | Pass |
|---|
| Acidityppm by weight as HCl | 0.4 | 1 max | Pass |
|---|
Look at the water row. 15 ppm is a pass on R-123, whose limit is 20 ppm — and the same result read against a single generic 10 ppm column — the limit that applies to most of the table, but not to this fluid — is a fail. On the low-pressure chiller line that mistake turns conforming material into a contamination discount or a disposal fee. R-123 also carries an isomer window the generic column has no row for at all: 0–8 each of R-123a, R-123b.